Safeguarding Medicaid eligibility in the budget downturn
During the last state fiscal crisis, from 2002 -04, funding for Oklahoma’s Medicaid program was hit hard. In FY ’02 and FY ’03, as revenues began to plummet, the Oklahoma Health Care Authority (OHCA) put coverage of almost all non-mandatory benefits and eligibility categories on the table for cuts. The agency ended up eliminating dental coverage for adults, reducing prescription drug coverage for seniors and persons with disabilities in home- and community-based waivers, limiting hospital in-patient coverage, and abolishing the medically needy eligibility program for individuals facing large medical bills, among other measures. Only an 11th-hour promise of supplemental funding by legislative leaders and some serious arm-twisting led OHCA’s Board to reverse a decision that would have eliminated eligibility for over 50,000 low-income children and pregnant women.
This time around, the prospects for the Medicaid program look considerably less precarious. The stimulus bill passed by Congress in February made available to the states large increases in the federal matching rate, known as FMAP, on the condition that states maintain Medicaid eligibility rules at pre-downturn levels. Recent guidelines released by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services spell out the maintenance of eligibility requirements with which states must comply to receive their enhanced FMAP. In addition to being prohibited from eliminating coverage for any group or sub-group covered under the state plan or a home- and community-based waiver, states are also barred from implementing any eligiblity standards, methodologies, or procedures that are more restrictive than those in effect on July 1, 2008. Specifically, a state may not:
- Institute new or increased premiums;
- Reduce occupied capacity or slots for waiver programs;
- Reduce income or resource standards, or implement more restrictive methodologies for determining financial eligibility; or
- Introduce more stringent or restrictive processes or procedures for determining eligibility.
In other words, not only will states be precluded from reducing income eligilbity directly, they will not be able to adopt backdoor tactics, such as new application procedures, that could keep eligible recipients out of the program.
Oklahoma has already received $174 million in enhanced FMAP and expects to benefit to the tune of perhaps $960 million through the end of CY 2010. This funding will not only mitigate cuts to health care, but is likely to free up state dollars to preserve other essential state services. In return for this level of investment, the federal government is doing the right thing by making sure that Medicaid eligibility standards remains in place for the low-income populations the program serves.



Good for the federal government requirements!
Something is seriously wrong when prison inmates of Oklahoma are provided with complete health, dental and prescription benefits, but Oklahoma’s elderly and disabled are considered optional! How to provide care for the needy is not an easy problem to tackle, but it certainly needs to be tackled.
Glenda
7 Apr 09 at 10:25 am
Thanks, Glenda. Hopefully the restrictions on cutting eligibility will not lead to proposals to cut benefits for seniors, persons with disabilities and others who are covered through Medicaid.
David
7 Apr 09 at 11:27 am
[...] of responding to budget shortfalls by cutting Medicaid eligibility is formally off the table. ARRA expressly prohibits states from implementing any eligibility standards, methodologies, or procedures that are more [...]
The crunch and the cliff: Medicaid funding faces dual perils | OK Policy Blog
30 Nov 09 at 10:27 am
[...] Back in December, OHCA’s Board approved an initial series of cuts to bring its FY ‘10 budget into balance based on anticipated monthly cuts of 5 percent to its appropriations from the General Revenue Fund. Because of the loss of federal matching funds, OHCA implemented some $69 million in cuts to make up for projected shortfalls in state funding of $16.9 million. The agency opted to eliminate or cap certain covered services and make changes to payment methods rather than cut reimbursement rates. It did warn at the time that deeper cuts would leave no option but to cut provider reimbursement. (As a condition of accepting enhanced federal matching dollars as part of the stimulus package, the state is strictly precluded from restricting Medicaid eligibility, as we discussed here). [...]
Say “ow”: Next round of Medicaid budget cuts to hit providers | OK Policy Blog
11 Jan 10 at 8:15 pm
[...] be prohibited from restricting Medicaid eligibility below levels in effect on July 1, 2008 (see our fuller discussion of how states must safeguard Medicaid eligibility). In addition, under the Senate version of the [...]
Enhanced Medicaid match extension would help state budget and low-income families | OK Policy Blog
8 Apr 10 at 1:33 pm
[...] for addressing funding shortfalls. As a result of the maintenance-of-effort provisions in the federal Recovery Act and the new federal health care law, the state is precluded from adopting more restrictive [...]
What’s at stake: Medicaid under the budget knife | OK Policy Blog
28 Apr 10 at 8:37 pm