Tax cuts do not have to be regressive
A recent OK Policy fact sheet that analyzed the distribution of benefits from cutting the state’s top personal income tax rate from 5.5 to 5.25 percent has generated considerable interest and discussion. The tax cut would have a $120 million revenue impact; the analysis – conducted for us by the Institute for Taxation and Economic Policy (ITEP) - found that:
- The top twenty percent of Oklahoma households – those with annual income above $85,800 – would receive 73 percent of the benefit of the tax cut;
- The average household would receive $24;
- More than two of every five households (43 percent) would receive no benefit at all.
We argued:
By taking so much revenue away and giving the benefits to a relatively small group, the state will be shifting a larger proportion of the cost of providing services onto lower- and middle-income Oklahomans.
Some critics of our brief have responded by asserting that tax cuts must by definition benefit the wealthy because they pay the most taxes, while lower-income Oklahomans are excluded because they lack any tax liability. For example, The Oklahoman’s editorial Board wrote, “Since the rich pay much more in taxes, it follows that they benefit much more from tax cuts.” Read the rest of this entry »


