Photo by flickr user brunkfordbraun used under a Creative Commons License.

At the first meeting of the legislature’s tax reform task force, both chairmen expressed support for making top-down cuts to Oklahoma’s income tax or eliminating it entirely. In a previous post, we explained why that’s a bad idea. In this post, we present three alternative reforms that would modernize the income tax and genuinely improve Oklahoma’s competitiveness and economy.

1. Update the Personal Exemption

Oklahoma’s personal exemption, which allows households to deduct a set amount from taxable income for each member, has not been changed since the early 1980s. The impact of inflation since that time means today the exemption is worth a just fraction of what it once was. Read the rest of this entry »

Earlier this year, we called attention to one of the stranger loopholes in the Oklahoma tax code, the case of the “double deduction” of state income taxes.  Federal tax law allows taxpayers who itemize their deductions to claim a deduction for state income tax, along with such expenses as home mortgage interest payments, charitable contributions, local property taxes and extraordinary medical expenses. While Oklahoma is among 31 states that allow taxpayers to itemize their deductions on their state income tax return as well, only in Oklahoma and five other states are taxpayers allowed to claim a deduction for state income taxes on their state tax return. In the context of the state’s huge revenue shortfalls and painful budget cuts, we urged the Legislature to follow New Mexico’s lead in taking action to disallow this deduction, which, according to estimates provided us by the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy (ITEP), would generate $118 million in additional revenue. Since only a minority of mostly wealthier taxpayers itemize their deduction, eliminating the deduction for state income taxes would also help address the inequities of our tax system, where low- and middle-income Oklahomans pay more of  their income in state and local taxes than do the wealthy. This proposal generated some interest but did not make its way into the final FY ’11 budget agreement.

ITEP is now out with a new report that provides a critical look at the subject of itemized deductions more broadly. Their basic argument is that itemized deductions  are an extremely regressive component of tax systems:

Itemized deductions impact tax fairness: low-income families receive virtually no benefit from these deductions, and the biggest benefits are reserved for the upper-income families who arguably need them the least Read the rest of this entry »