Another year goes by, and Oklahoma still leads the nation for cuts to education

Despite numerous promises by Oklahoma lawmakers that this would be the year they begin undoing K-12 education cuts and funding a desperately needed teacher raise, ultimately too many of our legislators refused to raise revenues. Unsurprisingly, a new update from the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities shows Oklahoma continues to lead the nation for cuts to our state aid formula since before the Great Recession.

The report, aptly titled “A Punishing Decade for School Funding”, shows that 29 states are still providing less general school funding per student than they were in 2008. When it comes to general state aid — the most important funding source for Oklahoma schools’ daily operating expenses and the salaries of teachers and other school staff — Oklahoma’s cuts are by far the worst. After inflation and enrollment growth, our percentage cut to state aid increased this year to 28.2 percent. No other state even tops 20 percent.

Oklahoma’s meager $2-per-pupil increase this year was not even enough to keep up with inflation, much less to offset the state’s $1,058-per-pupil cut over the previous nine years.

Oklahoma moved up in the ranks for cuts to total state funding of schools, too. From 2008 to 2015, the state reduced total school funding by 15.6 percent, seventh worst in the nation. Combined state and local funding levels are down by 11.8 percent, eighth worst in the nation.

Despite attempts by some education funding opponents to shift the blame for what’s happening in our schools, cuts of this magnitude cannot be wished away. The overwhelming reality is that underfunding — not administrative costs, color copies, or some other excuse — is the reason why Oklahoma’s teacher shortage is getting worse, schools are hiring more and more underqualified teachers, and one in five school districts in the state are no longer holding classes five days a week.

It’s also no coincidence that seven of the twelve states with the biggest cuts in general school funding since 2008 ― Arizona, Idaho, Kansas, Michigan, Mississippi, North Carolina, and Oklahoma ― have also cut income tax rates in recent years. The cost of income tax cuts and of huge tax breaks for oil and gas producers have overwhelmed all other attempts to raise revenue.

These cuts are weakening Oklahoma’s economy both today and for years to come. Businesses are refusing to move here because their employees don’t want to put their kids in our schools. Besides, quality elementary, middle, and high school education provides a crucial foundation that helps children to succeed in college and in the workplace. Much of the money they earn as adults is returned to the state economy through taxes, home purchases, and spending at local businesses.

In addition, school budgets that force school layoffs or cut pay for teachers and other staff can reduce purchasing power and slow the overall economy. The Center on Budget’s report finds that K-12 public schools employed about 135,000 fewer people in fall 2017 compared to fall 2008, even though enrollment nationwide was up by 1.4 million students. The most recent date for Oklahoma shows public schools employ 4,900 fewer workers compared to 2009 (a 5.3 percent decrease). Over that same time, enrollment in Oklahoma increased by nearly 48,000 students (7.4 percent).

“At a time when the nation is trying to position every child and every community to succeed in today’s economy, states should be investing more — not less — so our kids get the best possible start in life,” said Michael Leachman, director of state fiscal research at the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities and author of the report.

Unfortunately, that seems to be a lesson not yet learned by Oklahoma lawmakers — at least not enough of them to make a difference.

Learn More // Do More

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Gene Perry joined OK Policy in January 2011. He is a native Oklahoman and a citizen of the Cherokee Nation. He graduated from the University of Oklahoma with a B.A. in history and an M.A. in journalism. Gene also serves on the board of the Oklahoma Sustainability Network, is a trustee of the Oklahoma Foundation for Excellence, is a member of Investigative Reporters and Editors, and has chaired the communications advisory committee for the State Priorities Partnership, a nationwide network of state fiscal policy think tanks. He lives in Tulsa with his wife Kara Joy McKee, who is a Tulsa City Councilor.

2 thoughts on “Another year goes by, and Oklahoma still leads the nation for cuts to education

  1. Oklahoma legislators and a great deal of other Oklahomans are far too comfortable with our ‘lowest in the nation’ educational funding. Those of us who do care about our children/the public school population and aware Oklahomans need to take drastic action. My suggestion would be to hire the very best writers and recruiters and send them far and wide to boast about the ugly lack of concern in Oklahoma about our school system. We need to brag about our four day school week, laugh about teachers fleeing our boarders, and the decision makers (our legislators) calling extra sessions just to whine about their inability to fund anything after we are finished paying enormous amounts to our wealthiest citizens and richest industries- oil and gas, It will hurt Oklahoma, but what we are doing now is getting Oklahoma straight to the bottom. What we do need to do is shame Oklahoma. Go from state to state, city to city and brag about our terrible schools. Write in the editorial pages. Tell everyone you meet, “We in Oklahoma DON’T fund education and we’re proud of it”! Shame on you, Oklahoma. You are not educating our children, and to thank you later, they will leave this state to get their own children to cities and states that do understand the difference a great education will make in their lives!

  2. Two things could be done to stem the loss of career teachers in Oklahoma.
    1. Teachers who have over 25 years of service in Oklahoma no longer receive a yearly bump in pay. Extend the annual bump in pay to 35 years of service. While not much, at least the career teacher would know they are valued. This would help district close to state lines retain teachers who otherwise teach across the border after retiring.
    2. Allow retiring teacher to be rehired without the year waiting period. Thus the teacher could draw retirement and continue to teach drawing a salary.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.