‘Rural Opportunity Zones’ aren’t helping Kansas

Rep. Tom Newell

Rep. Tom Newell

We recently wrote about another tax break moving through the Oklahoma Legislature without any evidence that it will work or how much it will cost. HB 1747, by Rep. Tom Newell (R-Seminole), would create “Rural Opportunity Zones” where anyone moving from out-of-state to a county that is projected to lose population would be exempt from paying state income tax for five years.

The bill is modeled after a similar proposal in Kansas put in place and promoted by Governor Sam Brownback. In a recent KOCO story, Rep. Newell commented, “Kansas has had it on the books for like three or four years and every year they have actually added more counties to it because it has been so successful.”

Unfortunately, the fact that legislators are expanding a tax break does not constitute evidence that it is successful.

For real evidence, we can look at migration in the counties before and after the tax break. Kansas lawmakers created the tax exemption in 50 counties beginning in 2012, and they added another 23 counties in 2013. According to the U.S. Census, the counties designated as “Rural Opportunity Zones” in 2012 had a net loss of 473 people due to migration between 2010 and 2011. In the three years since the tax break was created, these counties had an average annual loss of 713 people, even more than they were losing before the tax break went into effect.

In the three years since the tax break was created, the Kansas ‘Rural Opportunity Zones’ averaged a net loss of 713 people per year.”

The counties added to the program in 2013 did not show much better results. The year before the tax break went into effect, these counties saw a net migration loss of 1,121 people. In the two years since, they’ve lost an average of 1,003 residents per year. Altogether, the Kansas “Rural Opportunity Zone” counties saw a net migration loss of 2,108 residents in 2014. (You can download the full data set here.)

Kansas as a whole is a terrible model for policies to attract new residents. Since 2010, about 15,300 more people moved out of Kansas than moved into the state, the sixth highest net migration loss in the country. Between 2013 and 2014, more than two-thirds of Kansas counties saw no growth or declining population. Under Governor Brownback, the state’s numerous tax cuts have brought large revenue losses and drained funding away from schools and other state services, while the Kansas economy continues to perform worse than the U.S. as a whole.

Rep. Newell’s eagerness to use the expansion of the tax break as evidence for its success also confirms our previous warning about the bill — if HB 1747 passes, it won’t be long until lawmakers seek to expand the number of counties given this tax break, even if there’s no evidence that it is working. That’s a frivolous waste of tax revenue, especially when lawmakers are already looking at slashing their support for schools, public safety, and other vital services.

The bill has already passed the House and is scheduled for the Senate Finance committee on April 7. You can find members of the committee here and find your Senator here.

Learn More // Do More

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Gene Perry joined OK Policy in January 2011. He is a native Oklahoman and a citizen of the Cherokee Nation. He graduated from the University of Oklahoma with a B.A. in history and an M.A. in journalism. Gene also serves on the board of the Oklahoma Sustainability Network, is a trustee of the Oklahoma Foundation for Excellence, is a member of Investigative Reporters and Editors, and has chaired the communications advisory committee for the State Priorities Partnership, a nationwide network of state fiscal policy think tanks. He lives in Tulsa with his wife Kara Joy McKee, who is a Tulsa City Councilor.

2 thoughts on “‘Rural Opportunity Zones’ aren’t helping Kansas

  1. Since the OK income tax is currently set to go from 5.25 percent to 5.0% – this additional tax cut is rubbing salt in the wound. Folks should be calling not only Rep Newell, but also Sears and jolly and Secretary Doerflinger. It never hurts to throw in a call to Speaker Hickman and President pro temp Bingman, as well.

  2. I have called and left messages and sent emails over and over. It has made absolutely no difference in their voting. The one person I actually spoke too told me that their hands are tied and they had tough choices to make due to the economic downturn and repeated their hands were tied. Seems like they don’t have any trouble getting rid of tax revenue, though. They never met a tax cut they didn’t like (except when it was suggested they exempt teachers from state tax). I wonder how much of the 611 million shortfall was due to loss of tax revenue for corporations and the wealthiest citizens from all those exemptions. That and all Scott Pruitt’s unconstitutional nose thumbing at the federal government that runs up huge bills fighting the lawsuits and challenges would make up a great big chunk of it. Funny how there was money to redecorate and refurnish the House and Senate last year, but education took another huge cut. This year there are raises for judges and Senate staffers even with the shortfall. Wonder how that happens?
    The other trick they are pulling in is when a bill does not get out of committee because of problems or outcry against it, they simply stick it inide another bill and piggyback it through before anyone has a chance to say “NO”. We are now stuck with corporate for profit charter schools,that don’t have to meet the same regulations that public schools do or have certified teachers, but will suck even more money out of the public system. Their actions speak for them.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.